鶹ý

Home   News   Features   Interviews   Magazine Archive   Symposium   Industry Awards  
Subscribe
鶹ý
Leading the Way

Global 鶹ý Finance News and Commentary
≔ Menu
鶹ý
Leading the Way

Global 鶹ý Finance News and Commentary
News by section
Subscribe
⨂ Close
  1. Home
  2. Industry news
  3. DTCC slap lawsuit onto “anticompetitive” CFTC rules
Industry news

DTCC slap lawsuit onto “anticompetitive” CFTC rules


08 May 2013 New York
Reporter: Georgina Lavers

Generic business image for news article
Image: Shutterstock
The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) and the DTCC Data Repository have filed a lawsuit challenging three interrelated actions by US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

The corporation are also asking a federal court to vacate the commission’s approval of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Rule 1001 and IntercontinentalExchange Rule 211.

DTCC general counsel Larry Thompson said in a statement that the CME and ICE Rules are anticompetitive and undermine the core pro-competitive principles of the Dodd-Frank Act.

“By approving these rules, CFTC changed its original adherence to the pro-competitive principles of Dodd-Frank and instead sanctioned anticompetitive behavior that allowed these clearing houses to require reporting of cleared swap data to their captive swap data repository (SDR).”

“Under the threat of a CME lawsuit last fall, the CFTC ignored the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and took action that paved the way for approval of these Rules. The Commission failed to properly consider the anticompetitive effects of Rules 1001 and 211, and did not comply with the legally required administrative or cost-benefit analysis procedures.

These rules, added Thompson, jeopardised the underlying principles of Dodd-Frank, were inconsistent with the commission’s own regulations, and compromised the ability of regulators and market participants to understand, assess and manage systemic risk.
“DTCC and DDR are market utilities and user-owned cooperatives and have now, after exhausting all regulatory channels, been forced to litigate to protect market participant choice, competition, and transparency and accountability in the global markets.”
← Previous industry article

Clearstream sees GSF rise by 2 percent
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 鶹ý Finance Times
Advertisement
Subscribe today
Knowledge base

Explore our extensive directory to find all the essential contacts you need

Visit our directory →

Discover definitions, explanations and related news articles in our glossary

Visit our glossary →