Â鶹´«Ã½

Home   News   Features   Interviews   Magazine Archive   Symposium   Industry Awards  
Subscribe
Â鶹´«Ã½
Leading the Way

Global Â鶹´«Ã½ Finance News and Commentary
≔ Menu
Â鶹´«Ã½
Leading the Way

Global Â鶹´«Ã½ Finance News and Commentary
News by section
Subscribe
⨂ Close
  1. Home
  2. Industry news
  3. SEC settles insider trading charges
Industry news

SEC settles insider trading charges


29 October 2015 Arizona
Reporter: Drew Nicol

Generic business image for news article
Image: Shutterstock
The US Â鶹´«Ã½ and Exchange Commission (SEC) has settled a case of insider trading and tipping against a senior figure of an Arizona real estate firm.

Mary Beth Knight was accused of abusing her position of senior vice president at Choice Hotels International to dump her shares in the company ahead of negative reports on the company’s earnings.

Knight also tipped off fellow shareholder Rebecca Norton, who then sold more than 3,000 shares of Choice Hotels stock over four days, and then short sold a further 500 shares for total profits and losses avoided of more than $44,000.

Despite not admitting or denying the allegations, Knight has agreed to pay $370,222 in total. The sum is made up of two disgorgements for both Knight and Norton’s avoided losses, as well as a civil penalty.

The SEC filed a civil action with the US District Court for the District of Arizona in May 2011, alleging: “ [Knight] attended a June 2006 meeting of executives at which disappointing projections of the company’s second quarter 2006 earnings results were discussed.â€

“In breach of her duty to the company and its shareholders, Knight sold 12,000 shares of Choice Hotels stock, avoiding losses of more than $140,000 that she would have suffered if she had sold the stock at its closing price on 26 July 2006, the first day of trading after the company announced the bad earnings news.â€

The final settlement included the SEC permanently enjoining Knight and Norton from violating Section 17(a) of the Â鶹´«Ã½ Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5.

Norton also accepted a settlement without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint.

The district court must still determine whether a civil penalty will be applied to Norton at a later date and give its approval of the settlements.
← Previous industry article

Russia’s NSD grows repo market
Next industry article →

Two US broker barred for fraud
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Â鶹´«Ã½ Finance Times
Advertisement
Subscribe today
Knowledge base

Explore our extensive directory to find all the essential contacts you need

Visit our directory →

Discover definitions, explanations and related news articles in our glossary

Visit our glossary →