New EU liquidity risk study promotes market tools
18 April 2016 London
Image: Shutterstock
European jurisdictions must make the full gamut of market-based liquidity tools available to tackle the rise of liquidity fragmentation, claims a new market study.
The report, jointly produced by two industry associations, argued that the European 麻豆传媒 Markets Authority and the European Systemic Risk Board must also fully utilise existing liquidity data being reported in Europe.
The reports highlighted 鈥渢he reduced role of banks as market makers and liquidity providers or the prolonged accommodative monetary policy of the world鈥檚 most prominent central banks鈥� as key drivers behind the trend.
The International Capital Market Association (ICMA) and the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA) commissioned the report in response to public concerns that 鈥渓iquidity has become more fragmented鈥�.
On the requirements of EU legislation, specifically UCITS and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), the reported concluded that 鈥渢he combination of regulatory requirements and market-based tools prove comprehensive and appropriate for liquidity management in both normal and exceptional circumstances鈥�.
Peter de Proft, director general at EFAMA, said: 鈥淥ur industry acknowledges the virtues of the EU regulatory regimes for funds.鈥�
鈥淚ndeed, existing regulatory requirements in EU legislation such as the UCITS and AIFMD regimes form a very far-reaching, strict and sound regime. The legal requirements have proven their merits and ensure appropriate liquidity management for investment funds.鈥�
Martin Scheck, CEO of ICMA, added: 鈥淚t shows that there is a comprehensive framework already in place available to managers to manage liquidity in difficult market conditions, through a combination of regulatory requirements and market-based tools.鈥�
The report, jointly produced by two industry associations, argued that the European 麻豆传媒 Markets Authority and the European Systemic Risk Board must also fully utilise existing liquidity data being reported in Europe.
The reports highlighted 鈥渢he reduced role of banks as market makers and liquidity providers or the prolonged accommodative monetary policy of the world鈥檚 most prominent central banks鈥� as key drivers behind the trend.
The International Capital Market Association (ICMA) and the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA) commissioned the report in response to public concerns that 鈥渓iquidity has become more fragmented鈥�.
On the requirements of EU legislation, specifically UCITS and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), the reported concluded that 鈥渢he combination of regulatory requirements and market-based tools prove comprehensive and appropriate for liquidity management in both normal and exceptional circumstances鈥�.
Peter de Proft, director general at EFAMA, said: 鈥淥ur industry acknowledges the virtues of the EU regulatory regimes for funds.鈥�
鈥淚ndeed, existing regulatory requirements in EU legislation such as the UCITS and AIFMD regimes form a very far-reaching, strict and sound regime. The legal requirements have proven their merits and ensure appropriate liquidity management for investment funds.鈥�
Martin Scheck, CEO of ICMA, added: 鈥淚t shows that there is a comprehensive framework already in place available to managers to manage liquidity in difficult market conditions, through a combination of regulatory requirements and market-based tools.鈥�
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 麻豆传媒 Finance Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 麻豆传媒 Finance Times
