Basel administers technical amendment on NSFR
03 July 2018 Basel
Image: Shutterstock
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has made a technical amendment to the net stable funding ratio standard (NSFR) to allow reduced required stable funding (RSF) factors for central bank claims with a maturity of more than six months.
The BCBS stated the technical amendment aims to 鈥渋ntroduce greater flexibility in the treatment of extraordinary central bank liquidity-absorbing monetary policy operations and ensure a balanced treatment of all central bank operations鈥� under the NSFR.
The BCBS said: 鈥淎t present, paragraph 31 of the NSFR standard refers to central bank liquidity- providing operations and, more specifically, to the treatment of the encumbered collateral for the term of the transaction.鈥�
It added: 鈥淗owever, it is silent about central bank liquidity-absorbing operations and the required stable funding factor for receivables (or claims) vis-脿-vis the central bank.鈥�
鈥淯nder certain circumstances, the current treatment may negatively impact the ability or readiness of banks to participate in liquidity absorbing operations by central banks in the form of secured transactions with maturities longer than six months.鈥�
The BCBS is adding the new amendment to paragraph 29 and it will apply to extraordinary liquidity-absorbing monetary policy operations.
Paragraph 29 states: 鈥淚n the case of exceptional central bank liquidity absorbing operations, claims on central banks may receive a reduced RSF factor. For those operations with a residual maturity equal to or greater than six months, the RSF factor must not be lower than 5 percent.鈥�
When applying a reduced RSF factor, supervisors need to closely monitor the ongoing impact on banks鈥� stable funding positions arising from the reduced requirement and take appropriate measures as needed.鈥�
It concludes: 鈥淎lso, as further specified in paragraph 31, assets that are provided as collateral for exceptional central bank liquidity providing operations may receive a reduced RSF factor which must not be lower than the RSF factor applied to the equivalent asset that is unencumbered. In both cases, supervisors should discuss and agree on the appropriate RSF factor with the relevant central bank.鈥�
The BCBS stated the technical amendment aims to 鈥渋ntroduce greater flexibility in the treatment of extraordinary central bank liquidity-absorbing monetary policy operations and ensure a balanced treatment of all central bank operations鈥� under the NSFR.
The BCBS said: 鈥淎t present, paragraph 31 of the NSFR standard refers to central bank liquidity- providing operations and, more specifically, to the treatment of the encumbered collateral for the term of the transaction.鈥�
It added: 鈥淗owever, it is silent about central bank liquidity-absorbing operations and the required stable funding factor for receivables (or claims) vis-脿-vis the central bank.鈥�
鈥淯nder certain circumstances, the current treatment may negatively impact the ability or readiness of banks to participate in liquidity absorbing operations by central banks in the form of secured transactions with maturities longer than six months.鈥�
The BCBS is adding the new amendment to paragraph 29 and it will apply to extraordinary liquidity-absorbing monetary policy operations.
Paragraph 29 states: 鈥淚n the case of exceptional central bank liquidity absorbing operations, claims on central banks may receive a reduced RSF factor. For those operations with a residual maturity equal to or greater than six months, the RSF factor must not be lower than 5 percent.鈥�
When applying a reduced RSF factor, supervisors need to closely monitor the ongoing impact on banks鈥� stable funding positions arising from the reduced requirement and take appropriate measures as needed.鈥�
It concludes: 鈥淎lso, as further specified in paragraph 31, assets that are provided as collateral for exceptional central bank liquidity providing operations may receive a reduced RSF factor which must not be lower than the RSF factor applied to the equivalent asset that is unencumbered. In both cases, supervisors should discuss and agree on the appropriate RSF factor with the relevant central bank.鈥�
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 麻豆传媒 Finance Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 麻豆传媒 Finance Times
