Comment: Robinhood hit with record penalties by FINRA
06 July 2021 US
Image: Yingko/adobe.stock.com
FINRA鈥檚 recent decision to impose $70 million in fines and damages on Robinhood Financial, provider (in its own words) of 鈥渃ommission free stock trading and investing apps鈥�, highlights how standards of investor protection may be downgraded as small-but-vocal groups of retail investors clamour for participatory democracy and a brokerage firm sacrifices transparency in the name of access and innovation.
Robinhood鈥檚 marketing statements are lofty and ambitious, describing how the broker since its formation in 2012 has been on a mission to democratise finance for all. 鈥淥ur values are in the service of our customers,鈥� says its mission statement. 鈥淲e strive to uphold our values every day鈥�.
In scrutinising the brokerage company鈥檚 actions, the US overseer of market integrity and investor protection concluded that Robinhood fell short on multiple occasions of the standards and commitments made in its customer documentation.
The financial watchdog鈥檚 decision to fine Robinhood $57 million and to pay a further $12.6 million in damages, plus interest, to harmed customers, represents the largest penalty ever imposed by FINRA.
鈥淭he fine reflects the scope and seriousness of Robinhood鈥檚 violations, including FINRA鈥檚 finding that Robinhood communicated false and misleading information to millions of customers,鈥� says FINRA鈥檚 enforcement department head Jessica Hopper.
The regulator's sanction took into account the 鈥渨idespread and significant harm suffered by customers鈥�, including millions of customers affected by the trading platform鈥檚 system outages in March 2020 and the thousands that the firm approved to trade options even when it was not appropriate for those customers to do so.
During a number of periods since 2016, FINRA found that the firm had 鈥渘egligently communicated false and misleading information to its customers鈥� 鈥� for example, concerning whether customers could trade on margin, how much cash was in customers鈥� accounts, the potential losses customers faced when placing options trades, and whether they faced margin calls.
鈥淒ue to Robinhood鈥檚 misstatements, thousands of customers suffered more than $7 million in total losses,鈥� said the financial regulator. Under the terms of its settlement, the company is required to pay more than $7 million in restitution to the customers affected.
At the forefront of its customer values, Robinhood describes itself as a 鈥渟afety first鈥� company. However, contrary to this declaration, FINRA found that the firm had failed to conduct appropriate due diligence when granting approvals to customers wishing to place options trades via its platform.
Often these approvals were granted by algorithms, or 鈥榦ption account approval bots鈥�, and were not validated by the firm鈥檚 principals, FINRA said. In multiple cases, these bots approved customers for options trading based on illogical or inconsistent information, thereby granting consent to customers that did not fulfil Robinhood鈥檚 eligibility criteria or where the account contained red flags indicating that options trading was not appropriate for the customer.
Robinhood was also found guilty by the financial watchdog of falling short in its regulatory reporting obligations Over a three-year period from January 2018, Robinhood neglected to disclose to FINRA tens of thousands of customer complaints that it should have reported, including customer claims that the brokerage company had provided false and misleading information.
For the period January 2018 to February 2021, FINRA finds that the company failed to adequately supervise the technology that it employed to provide core brokerage services. The firm experienced a number of critical systems failures during this period and was unable to accept customers鈥� orders while these platform outages persisted.
This, according to FINRA, resulted in individual customers losing tens of thousands of dollars as a result of these technical failures. Robinhood was ordered to pay over $5 million in damages to customers affected by this issue.
Commenting on its conclusions, FINRA says: 鈥淭his action sends a clear message - all FINRA member firms, regardless of their size or business model, must comply with the rules that govern the brokerage industry, rules which are designed to protect investors and the integrity of our markets.鈥�
鈥淐ompliance with these rules is not optional and cannot be sacrificed for the sake of innovation or a willingness to 鈥榖reak things鈥� and fix them later,鈥� said FINRA鈥檚 Hopper.
Robinhood鈥檚 marketing statements are lofty and ambitious, describing how the broker since its formation in 2012 has been on a mission to democratise finance for all. 鈥淥ur values are in the service of our customers,鈥� says its mission statement. 鈥淲e strive to uphold our values every day鈥�.
In scrutinising the brokerage company鈥檚 actions, the US overseer of market integrity and investor protection concluded that Robinhood fell short on multiple occasions of the standards and commitments made in its customer documentation.
The financial watchdog鈥檚 decision to fine Robinhood $57 million and to pay a further $12.6 million in damages, plus interest, to harmed customers, represents the largest penalty ever imposed by FINRA.
鈥淭he fine reflects the scope and seriousness of Robinhood鈥檚 violations, including FINRA鈥檚 finding that Robinhood communicated false and misleading information to millions of customers,鈥� says FINRA鈥檚 enforcement department head Jessica Hopper.
The regulator's sanction took into account the 鈥渨idespread and significant harm suffered by customers鈥�, including millions of customers affected by the trading platform鈥檚 system outages in March 2020 and the thousands that the firm approved to trade options even when it was not appropriate for those customers to do so.
During a number of periods since 2016, FINRA found that the firm had 鈥渘egligently communicated false and misleading information to its customers鈥� 鈥� for example, concerning whether customers could trade on margin, how much cash was in customers鈥� accounts, the potential losses customers faced when placing options trades, and whether they faced margin calls.
鈥淒ue to Robinhood鈥檚 misstatements, thousands of customers suffered more than $7 million in total losses,鈥� said the financial regulator. Under the terms of its settlement, the company is required to pay more than $7 million in restitution to the customers affected.
At the forefront of its customer values, Robinhood describes itself as a 鈥渟afety first鈥� company. However, contrary to this declaration, FINRA found that the firm had failed to conduct appropriate due diligence when granting approvals to customers wishing to place options trades via its platform.
Often these approvals were granted by algorithms, or 鈥榦ption account approval bots鈥�, and were not validated by the firm鈥檚 principals, FINRA said. In multiple cases, these bots approved customers for options trading based on illogical or inconsistent information, thereby granting consent to customers that did not fulfil Robinhood鈥檚 eligibility criteria or where the account contained red flags indicating that options trading was not appropriate for the customer.
Robinhood was also found guilty by the financial watchdog of falling short in its regulatory reporting obligations Over a three-year period from January 2018, Robinhood neglected to disclose to FINRA tens of thousands of customer complaints that it should have reported, including customer claims that the brokerage company had provided false and misleading information.
For the period January 2018 to February 2021, FINRA finds that the company failed to adequately supervise the technology that it employed to provide core brokerage services. The firm experienced a number of critical systems failures during this period and was unable to accept customers鈥� orders while these platform outages persisted.
This, according to FINRA, resulted in individual customers losing tens of thousands of dollars as a result of these technical failures. Robinhood was ordered to pay over $5 million in damages to customers affected by this issue.
Commenting on its conclusions, FINRA says: 鈥淭his action sends a clear message - all FINRA member firms, regardless of their size or business model, must comply with the rules that govern the brokerage industry, rules which are designed to protect investors and the integrity of our markets.鈥�
鈥淐ompliance with these rules is not optional and cannot be sacrificed for the sake of innovation or a willingness to 鈥榖reak things鈥� and fix them later,鈥� said FINRA鈥檚 Hopper.
← Previous industry article
China Renaissance expands post-trade processing relationship with Broadridge
China Renaissance expands post-trade processing relationship with Broadridge
Next industry article →
GSX invests in Hong Kong partner to establish Asia-based digital asset platform
GSX invests in Hong Kong partner to establish Asia-based digital asset platform
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 麻豆传媒 Finance Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 麻豆传媒 Finance Times
