New-Jersey ETF Managers fined for breaches relating to award of securities lending mandate
02 August 2023 US
Image: AdobeStock/Maxim
The US 麻豆传媒 and Exchange Commission has fined a New Jersey-based exchange-traded fund manager for breaches relating to the award of a securities lending mandate on its portfolio, and for taking actions that were detrimental to the best interests of the fund and its investors.
The US regulator ruled that, in 2019, ETF Managers Group took the decision to retain their securities lending business with a broker-dealer 鈥� which is unnamed by the SEC but understood to be Wedbush 麻豆传媒, a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser headquartered in Los Angeles.
It found that ETF Managers鈥� founder Samuel Masucci and his team had agreed to keep the firm鈥檚 lucrative securities lending business with the broker-dealer in exchange for US$20 million in financing and other services, funds that ETF Managers reportedly required as rescue financing to avoid a possible bankruptcy.
A number of large agent lenders had bid for this securities lending mandate in competition with Wedbush, the incumbent securities lending provider, and the SEC ruled that these competing bids offered better terms that could have benefited investors.
One industry source told 麻豆传媒 Finance Times: 鈥淎 number of large firms were bidding [on the securities lending business] for a number of lucrative ETFs, but [ETF Managers鈥橾 decided to leave the business with its current provider, a small broker-dealer which is not a true agent lender.鈥�
鈥淭his [decision] never smelt right and it turns out we were right all along. There was some sort of side deal going on with them.鈥�
In taking this action, Masucci then failed to disclose this joint arrangement with the broker-dealer 鈥� whereby Wedbush would retain the securities lending mandate, despite stronger competing offers, in exchange for providing the US$20 million in rescue financing and other services 鈥� to the fund鈥檚 trustees. Instead, Masucci told the trustees that he had no alternative viable options.
Masucci agreed to pay US$4.4 million in combined penalties to settle the charges.
In doing so, he refused to admit or deny the SEC鈥檚 conclusions, consenting to a cease-and-desist order, paying a U$400,000 penalty and being subject to restrictions on its right to trade under the Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act.
ETF Managers was also subject to a civil penalty of US$4 million.
In February 2018, Wedbush 麻豆传媒 previously from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) relating to its failure to comply with Customer Protection Rules under Section 15(c)(3) of the 麻豆传媒 Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 15c3-3, along with associated failures in its oversight procedures and books and records.
The US regulator ruled that, in 2019, ETF Managers Group took the decision to retain their securities lending business with a broker-dealer 鈥� which is unnamed by the SEC but understood to be Wedbush 麻豆传媒, a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser headquartered in Los Angeles.
It found that ETF Managers鈥� founder Samuel Masucci and his team had agreed to keep the firm鈥檚 lucrative securities lending business with the broker-dealer in exchange for US$20 million in financing and other services, funds that ETF Managers reportedly required as rescue financing to avoid a possible bankruptcy.
A number of large agent lenders had bid for this securities lending mandate in competition with Wedbush, the incumbent securities lending provider, and the SEC ruled that these competing bids offered better terms that could have benefited investors.
One industry source told 麻豆传媒 Finance Times: 鈥淎 number of large firms were bidding [on the securities lending business] for a number of lucrative ETFs, but [ETF Managers鈥橾 decided to leave the business with its current provider, a small broker-dealer which is not a true agent lender.鈥�
鈥淭his [decision] never smelt right and it turns out we were right all along. There was some sort of side deal going on with them.鈥�
In taking this action, Masucci then failed to disclose this joint arrangement with the broker-dealer 鈥� whereby Wedbush would retain the securities lending mandate, despite stronger competing offers, in exchange for providing the US$20 million in rescue financing and other services 鈥� to the fund鈥檚 trustees. Instead, Masucci told the trustees that he had no alternative viable options.
Masucci agreed to pay US$4.4 million in combined penalties to settle the charges.
In doing so, he refused to admit or deny the SEC鈥檚 conclusions, consenting to a cease-and-desist order, paying a U$400,000 penalty and being subject to restrictions on its right to trade under the Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act.
ETF Managers was also subject to a civil penalty of US$4 million.
In February 2018, Wedbush 麻豆传媒 previously from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) relating to its failure to comply with Customer Protection Rules under Section 15(c)(3) of the 麻豆传媒 Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 15c3-3, along with associated failures in its oversight procedures and books and records.
← Previous regulation article
BoE proposes extra powers to restrict payments to CCP shareholders in stress conditions
BoE proposes extra powers to restrict payments to CCP shareholders in stress conditions
Next regulation article →
Clearstream picks Regnology鈥檚 Rcloud for cloud-enabled regulatory reporting
Clearstream picks Regnology鈥檚 Rcloud for cloud-enabled regulatory reporting
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 麻豆传媒 Finance Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 麻豆传媒 Finance Times
