SFTS: Repo market is crucially important and prone to vulnerabilities
24 November 2022 UK
Image: megaflopp/stock.adobe.com
鈥淚f the repo market does not work, none of it works,鈥� said International Capital Market Association (ICMA) senior director Andy Hill, when discussing repo as a cornerstone of the financial system at 麻豆传媒 Finance Times鈥� winter 麻豆传媒 Finance Technology Symposium.
Hill made the comment on the Symposium鈥檚 Repo Panel which outlined how the industry can make the market more resilient, beyond regulatory intervention.
The discussion was spearheaded by BondCliq鈥檚 head of European Expansion Gabriele Frediani, who moderated the timely Repo panel, which took place amid the backdrop of wider industry concerns surrounding the repo market.
The panel consisted of EMEA head of financing solutions business development at State Street Cassandra Jones, EMEA director of sales at GLMX Andy Turvey, and head of business development straight-through processing (STP) at MarketAxess Camille McKelvey.
Providing an overview of the repo landscape, ICMA鈥檚 Hill said: 鈥淩epo is a bank-intermediated product, repo trades through the balance sheets of banks.
鈥淚t is important that banks are able to trade their match books, to take positions onto their balance sheet and provide two-way liquidity in repo across all different bond classes. This is becoming more difficult.鈥�
The panel raised concern over Basel regulation, alluding that its regulation has made it increasingly expensive for the industry to apply balance sheet, particularly for repo, which is a relatively high volume, low return transaction.
According to ICMA鈥檚 Hill, the industry has seen banks improve balance sheet management over time and has witnessed a move to increased clearing. However, the industry is still having moments of vulnerability.
He added: 鈥淲e hear concern from money market funds that are being penalised for being long cash for certain times in the year.
鈥淲e hear concerns from pension funds that worry about being able to meet margin calls, because they have to 鈥榬epo out鈥� their holdings to raise cash. The repo market is crucially important and prone to vulnerabilities.鈥�
To aid the repo market in dealing with such vulnerabilities, the panel discussed the push toward incorporating automation.
MarketAxess鈥� McKelvey explained: 鈥淲hen it comes to the repo market and the adoption of automation, it has been very slow, and we still have a fairly long way to go. However, in the last two to three years, there has been a real shift and a focus on repo automation and repo workflow from front to back.
鈥淲e are starting to see more and more buy-side firms coming onto the post-trade repo platform at MarketAxess. These clients have been instrumental in this growth by working with their sell-side counterparts to move to post-trade automation.鈥�
Market participants expressed the need for change in the repo markets. One panellist said that if regulation does not change, it is imperative that the repo market see a continued innovation to help give clients and banks optionality to be able to 鈥減ull different levers to deal with the regulatory reporting times鈥�.
Whether it be incorporating more peer-to-peer structures, or re-evaluating securities lending and the cost of indemnification, change is needed to allow banks and dealers to provide a more efficient way of offering liquidity, the panellist concluded.
Hill made the comment on the Symposium鈥檚 Repo Panel which outlined how the industry can make the market more resilient, beyond regulatory intervention.
The discussion was spearheaded by BondCliq鈥檚 head of European Expansion Gabriele Frediani, who moderated the timely Repo panel, which took place amid the backdrop of wider industry concerns surrounding the repo market.
The panel consisted of EMEA head of financing solutions business development at State Street Cassandra Jones, EMEA director of sales at GLMX Andy Turvey, and head of business development straight-through processing (STP) at MarketAxess Camille McKelvey.
Providing an overview of the repo landscape, ICMA鈥檚 Hill said: 鈥淩epo is a bank-intermediated product, repo trades through the balance sheets of banks.
鈥淚t is important that banks are able to trade their match books, to take positions onto their balance sheet and provide two-way liquidity in repo across all different bond classes. This is becoming more difficult.鈥�
The panel raised concern over Basel regulation, alluding that its regulation has made it increasingly expensive for the industry to apply balance sheet, particularly for repo, which is a relatively high volume, low return transaction.
According to ICMA鈥檚 Hill, the industry has seen banks improve balance sheet management over time and has witnessed a move to increased clearing. However, the industry is still having moments of vulnerability.
He added: 鈥淲e hear concern from money market funds that are being penalised for being long cash for certain times in the year.
鈥淲e hear concerns from pension funds that worry about being able to meet margin calls, because they have to 鈥榬epo out鈥� their holdings to raise cash. The repo market is crucially important and prone to vulnerabilities.鈥�
To aid the repo market in dealing with such vulnerabilities, the panel discussed the push toward incorporating automation.
MarketAxess鈥� McKelvey explained: 鈥淲hen it comes to the repo market and the adoption of automation, it has been very slow, and we still have a fairly long way to go. However, in the last two to three years, there has been a real shift and a focus on repo automation and repo workflow from front to back.
鈥淲e are starting to see more and more buy-side firms coming onto the post-trade repo platform at MarketAxess. These clients have been instrumental in this growth by working with their sell-side counterparts to move to post-trade automation.鈥�
Market participants expressed the need for change in the repo markets. One panellist said that if regulation does not change, it is imperative that the repo market see a continued innovation to help give clients and banks optionality to be able to 鈥減ull different levers to deal with the regulatory reporting times鈥�.
Whether it be incorporating more peer-to-peer structures, or re-evaluating securities lending and the cost of indemnification, change is needed to allow banks and dealers to provide a more efficient way of offering liquidity, the panellist concluded.
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 麻豆传媒 Finance Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 麻豆传媒 Finance Times
